Skip to content
Line C · Capabilities

Preference data from raters who are actually calibrated

Reward-model quality is bounded by rater agreement. We run pods against a versioned rubric with weekly calibration, blind gold seeding and a documented escalation path for every ambiguity.

Line
Line C
Services
4
Acceptance
≥95%
Agreement
κ ≥ 0.7
A named podRatios hold at every scale

1.3×

Calibrated bench

Held against deployed demand

100%

KYC verified

Before task access is granted

What you receive

Training data with the agreement statistics attached, so you know what you are training on.

Services in this line

RLHF & Human Feedback

Per item / per pod-month

Preference data, critique writing and demonstration data from trained rater pods.

Rubric-anchored reward-model data produced by named pods under weekly calibration, with per-dimension agreement reported per batch.

Deliverables

  • Preference pairs
  • Written critiques
  • SFT demonstrations
  • Agreement statistics

Prompt Engineering & Red-Team Sets

Per prompt set

Adversarial prompt design and evaluation-prompt curation.

Instruction datasets and red-team prompt sets built against an explicit coverage matrix, so gaps are visible rather than assumed.

Deliverables

  • Prompt sets
  • Coverage matrix
  • Adversarial variants
  • Curation rationale

Synthetic Dataset Generation

Per dataset

Model-assisted generation with human seed curation and verification.

Generation pipelines with human-curated seeds, deduplication and a verification layer. Delivered with a quality-audit sample rather than a raw dump.

Deliverables

  • Generated dataset
  • Seed curation log
  • Dedup report
  • Audit sample

Expert Data Annotation

Per item

Expert text and code annotation, not commodity labelling.

Entity labelling, classification, reasoning-step tagging and error-taxonomy application performed by domain-matched specialists.

Deliverables

  • Annotated corpus
  • Taxonomy definitions
  • Edge-case register